• Semantic Search.
• Process Mining
• Mining Software Repositories
• learning activities in Open Source
• FLOSS learning processes

Evidence suggests that Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) environments provide unlimited learning opportunities. Community members engage in a number of activities both during their interaction with their peers and while making use of these environments’ repositories. To date, numerous studies document the existence of learning processes in FLOSS through surveys or by means of questionnaires filled by FLOSS projects participants. At the same time, there is a surge in developing tools and techniques for extracting and analyzing data from different FLOSS data sources that has birthed a new field called Mining Software Repositories (MSR).
In spite of these growing tools and techniques for mining FLOSS repositories, there is limited or no existing approaches to providing empirical evidence of learning processes directly from these repositories. Therefore, in this work we sought to trigger such an initiative by proposing an approach based on Process Mining. With this technique, we aim to trace learning behaviors from FLOSS participants’ trails of activities as recorded in FLOSS repositories. We identify the participants as Novices and Experts. A Novice is defined as any FLOSS member that benefits from a learning experience through acquiring new skills while the Expert is the provider of these skills.
The significance of our work is mainly twofold. First and foremost, we extend the MSR field by showing the potential of mining FLOSS repositories by applying Process Mining techniques. Lastly, our work provides critical evidence that boosts the understanding of learning behavior in FLOSS communities by analyzing the relevant repositories. In order to accomplish this, we have proposed and implemented a methodology that follows a seven-step approach including developing an appropriate terminology or ontology for learning processes in FLOSS, contextualizing learning processes through a-priori models, generating Event Logs, generating corresponding process models, interpreting and evaluating the value of process discovery, performing conformance analysis and verifying a number of formulated hypotheses with regard to tracing learning patterns in FLOSS communities.
The implementation of this approach has resulted in the development of the Ontology of Learning in FLOSS (OntoLiFLOSS) environments that defines the terms needed to describe learning processes in FLOSS as well as providing a visual representation of these processes through Petri net-like Workflow nets. Moreover, another novelty pertains to the mining of FLOSS repositories by defining and describing the preliminaries required for preprocessing FLOSS data before applying Process Mining techniques for analysis. Through a step-by-step process, we effectively detail how the Event Logs are constructed through generating key phrases and making use of Semantic Search.
Taking a FLOSS environment called Openstack as our data source, we apply our proposed techniques to identify learning activities based on key phrases catalogs and classification rules expressed through pseudo code as well as the appropriate Process Mining tool. We thus produced Event Logs that are based on the semantic content of messages in Openstack’s Mailing archives, Internet Relay Chat (IRC) messages, Reviews, Bug reports and Source code to retrieve the corresponding activities. Considering these repositories in light of the three learning process phases (Initiation, Progression and maturation), we produced an Event Log for each participant (Novice or Expert) in every phase on the corresponding dataset. Hence, we produced 14 Event Logs that helped build 14 corresponding process maps which are visual representation of the flow occurrence of learning activities in FLOSS for each participant.
These process maps provide critical indications that speak volumes in terms of the presence of learning processes in the analyzed repositories. The results show that learning activities do occur at a significant rate during messages exchange on both Mailing archives and IRC messages. The slight differences between the two datasets can be highlighted in two ways. First, the involvement of Experts is more on
iv
IRC than it is on Mailing archives with 7.22% and 0.36% of Expert involvement respectively on IRC forums and Mailing lists. This can be justified by the differences in the length of messages sent on these two datasets. The average length of sent messages is 3261 characters for an email compared to 60 characters for a chat message. The evidence produced from this mining experiment solidifies the finding in terms of the existence of learning processes in FLOSS as well as the scale at which they occur. While the Initiation phase shows the Novice as the most involved in the start of the learning process, during Progression phase the involvement of the Expert can be seen to be significantly increasing.
In order to trace the advanced skills in the Maturation phase, we look at repositories that store data about developing, creating code, examining and reviewing the code, identifying and fixing possible bugs. Therefore, we consider three repositories including Source Code, Bug reports and Reviews. The results obtained in this phase largely justify the choice of these three datasets to track learning behavior at this stage. Both the Bug reports and the Source code demonstrate the commitment of the Novice to seek answers and interact as much as possible in strengthening the acquired skills. With a participation of 49.22% for the Novice against 46.72% for the Expert and 46.19 % against 42.04% respectively on Bug reports and Source code, the Novice still engages significantly in learning. On the last dataset, Reviews, we notice an increase in the Expert’s role. The Expert performs activities to the tune of 40.36 % of total number of activities against 22.17 % for the Novice.
The last steps of our methodology steer the comparison of the defined a-priori models with final models that describe how learning processes occur according to the actual behavior from Event Logs. Our attempts to producing process models start with depicting process maps to track the actual behaviour as it occurs in Openstack repositories, before concluding with final Petri net models representative of learning processes in FLOSS as a result of conformance analysis.
For every dataset in the corresponding learning phase, we produce 3 process maps respectively depicting the overall learning behaviour for all FLOSS community members (Novice or Expert together), then the Novice and Expert. In total, we produced 21 process maps, empirically describing process models on real data, 14 process models in the form of Petri nets for every participant on each dataset.
We make use of the Artificial Immune System (AIS) algorithms to merge the 14 Event Logs that uniquely capture the behaviour of every participant on different datasets in the three phases. We then reanalyze the resulting logs in order to produce 6 global models that inclusively provide a comprehensive depiction of participants’ learning behavior in FLOSS communities. This description hints that Workflow nets introduced as our a-priori models give rather a more simplistic representation of learning processes in FLOSS. Nevertheless, our experiments with Event Logs starting from process discovery to conformance checking from Openstack repositories demonstrate that the real learning behaviors are more complete and most importantly largely submerge these simplistic a-priori models.
Finally, our methodology has proved to be effective in both providing a novel alternative for mining FLOSS repositories and providing empirical evidence that describes how knowledge is exchanged in FLOSS environments. Moreover, our results enrich the MSR field by providing a reproducible step-by-step problem solving approach that can be customized to answer subsequent research questions in FLOSS repositories using Process Mining.