ETD

Archivio digitale delle tesi discusse presso l'Università di Pisa

Tesi etd-11092012-174130


Tipo di tesi
Tesi di laurea specialistica
Autore
MARGHERI, LUCA
URN
etd-11092012-174130
Titolo
Quantification of epistemic uncertainties and parameter calibration in RANS turbulence models
Dipartimento
INGEGNERIA
Corso di studi
INGEGNERIA AEROSPAZIALE
Relatori
relatore Prof. Salvetti, Maria Vittoria
relatore Prof. Sagaut, Pierre
relatore Dott. Meldi, Marcello
Parole chiave
  • RANS models
  • generalized polynomial chaos
  • uncertainty
Data inizio appello
27/11/2012
Consultabilità
Non consultabile
Data di rilascio
27/11/2052
Riassunto
Thanks to its limited computational requirements, the RANS approach has extensively been used and is still used to predict the low-order statistics of high Reynolds number turbulent flows. The main drawback is that an universal setup of the closure turbulence models has proved to be elusive. The free parameters present in turbulence models are usually derived from estimated deterministic values of some properties of benchmark turbulent flows, as e.g. the energy power law exponent for decaying homogeneous isotropic turbulence or the value of the Von Karman constant. The free parameters present in different well-known turbulence models are obtained herein by considering the underlying properties as random variables over a bounded range. This range has been recovered from the results reported in literature for the relevant properties, so that the considered epistemic uncertainty is realistic. The sensitivity to this uncertainty of the results of turbulent channel flow RANS simulations is then investigated for different Reynolds numbers and for two popular RANS models, viz. the K-epsilon Launder-Sharma and the Menter K-omega SST. The RANS solution is reconstructed over the continuous multi-dimensional uncertainty space of the considered random variables through the application of a surrogate model (response surface) obtained by means of generalized Polynomial Chaos. The model coefficients of the two considered RANS models are then calibrated and compared to literature standard values.
File