| Tesi etd-06292023-202737 | 
    Link copiato negli appunti
  
    Tipo di tesi
  
  
    Tesi di laurea magistrale
  
    Autore
  
  
    BIASIA, LUCA  
  
    URN
  
  
    etd-06292023-202737
  
    Titolo
  
  
    Beam optics simulation with MAD-X of piE5 beam line at PSI and beam measurements for the MEG-II physics run 2023.
  
    Dipartimento
  
  
    FISICA
  
    Corso di studi
  
  
    FISICA
  
    Relatori
  
  
    relatore  Papa, Angela
  
    Parole chiave
  
  - accelerator physics
- beam measurements
    Data inizio appello
  
  
    20/07/2023
  
    Consultabilità
  
  
    Tesi non consultabile
  
    Riassunto
  
  The MEG-II experiment is a particle physics experiment designed to search for the rare decay of a muon to an electron and a photon, aiming to explore new physics beyond the Standard Model, via Charged Lepton Flavour Violation (cLFV). A precise understanding of the beam optics is crucial for optimizing the experiment’s sensitivity and ensuring its success. During my master’s thesis I performed the measurements for the beam tuning for the last part of the physics run 2022 and for the physics run 2023. That was a chance to directly put my hands on the beam line elements of the MEG-II πE5 beam line and become acquainted with the beamline elements themselves. In this study I implemented for the first time the MAD-X simulation tool to describe the πE5 beam line. To achieve this, I first developed a comprehensive model of the MEG-II beamline using MAD-X, an open-source beam optics simulation software for designing and simulating particle accelerators. The model includes all relevant magnetic and electrostatic elements, as well as a detailed description of the beam and its initial conditions. The simulation results were initially compared to the G4Beamline’s, a Geant4-based toolkit specifically tailored for beamline simulations, and the model was refined until a satisfactory agreement was reached. The comparison between MAD-X and G4Beamline results provided valuable insights into the differences and limitations of both tools, as well as the level of agreement that can be expected in the context of the MEG-II experiment. To further validate the MAD-X model and assess its accuracy, a benchmark study has been performed with experimental data during beam-time in preparation of physics run 2023 of MEG-II experiment, when beam studies have been carried out at the collimator system as well as at the center of the experiment with different diagnostic tools. The motivation for this work arises from the need to accurately model the MEG-II beam line, particularly in terms of beam optics and particle trajectories.
The primary objective is to provide a detailed and reliable simulation framework that can be used by beamline users to study and optimize various aspects of the experiment, such as beam transport, energy deposition, and background reduction. The outcome of this thesis is a robust and well-validated beam optics simulation for the MEG-II experiment that can be employed by beamline users for various purposes, from the optimization of experimental configurations to the development of new analysis techniques. The comparison between MAD-X and G4Beamline results further establishes the reliability of the developed model and provides a valuable benchmark for future studies.
The primary objective is to provide a detailed and reliable simulation framework that can be used by beamline users to study and optimize various aspects of the experiment, such as beam transport, energy deposition, and background reduction. The outcome of this thesis is a robust and well-validated beam optics simulation for the MEG-II experiment that can be employed by beamline users for various purposes, from the optimization of experimental configurations to the development of new analysis techniques. The comparison between MAD-X and G4Beamline results further establishes the reliability of the developed model and provides a valuable benchmark for future studies.
    File
  
  | Nome file | Dimensione | 
|---|---|
| Tesi non consultabile. | |
 
		