Thesis etd-01232023-124603 |
Link copiato negli appunti
Thesis type
Tesi di laurea specialistica LC6
Author
MANNOCCI, VIRGINIA
URN
etd-01232023-124603
Thesis title
Sacrocolpopessi addominale mini-invasiva e sospensione laterale addominale: uno studio prospettico, multicentrico, open label, di non inferiorità.
Department
RICERCA TRASLAZIONALE E DELLE NUOVE TECNOLOGIE IN MEDICINA E CHIRURGIA
Course of study
MEDICINA E CHIRURGIA
Supervisors
relatore Prof. Simoncini, Tommaso
correlatore Dott.ssa Russo, Eleonora
correlatore Dott.ssa Russo, Eleonora
Keywords
- chirurgia addominale mini-invasiva
- difetto apicale
- lateral suspension
- minimally invasive abdominal surgery
- sacral suspension.
- sospensione laterale
- sospensione sacrale. apical defect
Graduation session start date
14/02/2023
Availability
Withheld
Release date
14/02/2093
Summary
La chirurgia addominale mininvasiva è una strategia di crescente importanza nel trattamento del prolasso. La sacrocolpopessi addominale (ASC) è la tecnica di prima scelta ma si stanno sperimentando approcci alternativi come la sospensione laterale addominale (ALS). E' stato condotto uno studio prospettico, open-label, multicentrico, di non inferiorità su 360 pazienti che si sono sottoposte a ASC o ALS per il trattamento del prolasso apicale per valutare l'efficacia della ricostruzione, la scomparsa dei sintomi e poi il tasso di recidive, di reintervento e di complicanze postoperatorie. A un anno di followup l'efficacia curativa è stata molto simile per le due tecniche, con tassi di recidiva e complicanze postoperatorie privi di differenze significative. Questo mostra che la tecnica di sospensione laterale non è inferiore alla sacrocolpopessi per il trattamento del prolasso apicale.
Abdominal Minimally Invasive Surgery has become increasingly prominent for the treatment of prolapse. Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy (ASC) is the gold standard for treating advanced apical prolapse, nevertheless, alternative surgical approaches such as Abdominal Lateral Suspension (ALS) have been devised. A prospective, open-label, multicenter, non-inferiority trial involving 360 patients who underwent ASC or ALS for apical prolapse treatment was conducted to evaluate the anatomic and symptomatic cure of the apical compartment, prolapse recurrence, reoperation rate, and postoperative complications. After 12-month follow-up, the objective cure rate for the apical defect was very similar and the recurrence and complications rates were not significantly different for ALS and ASC. The results of this trial show that the current ALS technique is not inferior to ASC for apical POP surgical treatment.
Abdominal Minimally Invasive Surgery has become increasingly prominent for the treatment of prolapse. Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy (ASC) is the gold standard for treating advanced apical prolapse, nevertheless, alternative surgical approaches such as Abdominal Lateral Suspension (ALS) have been devised. A prospective, open-label, multicenter, non-inferiority trial involving 360 patients who underwent ASC or ALS for apical prolapse treatment was conducted to evaluate the anatomic and symptomatic cure of the apical compartment, prolapse recurrence, reoperation rate, and postoperative complications. After 12-month follow-up, the objective cure rate for the apical defect was very similar and the recurrence and complications rates were not significantly different for ALS and ASC. The results of this trial show that the current ALS technique is not inferior to ASC for apical POP surgical treatment.
File
Nome file | Dimensione |
---|---|
Thesis not available for consultation. |